New Law, Jan 1/09 - Decal needed $25

The press release from the Arizona Game and Fish says it all…

News Media - Dec 19, 2008 -New state laws requiring purchase take effect Jan. 1

A coalition of state agencies has agreed on a price for the new off-highway vehicle (OHV) decal that will be required in Arizona to operate most ATVs, dirt bikes, and other OHVs meeting certain criteria beginning in January.

The “OHV Decal” will cost $25 and will be issued annually through the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (MVD). Revenues from the purchase of the decal will help better manage Arizona’s exploding OHV use and help protect natural resources.

“This is the most important legislation that I have sponsored,” said Rep. Jerry Weiers (R-Glendale). “This legislation will allow folks to better enjoy outdoor Arizona in a safe and responsible way.”

The OHV Decal is a part of new OHV laws taking effect Jan. 1, 2009. The laws will require the annual purchase of the decal for any OHV designed by the manufacturer primarily for travel over unimproved terrain and weighing 1,800 pounds or less. Beginning Jan. 1, owners whose OHVs are currently titled or registered in Arizona may purchase the decal online at www.servicearizona.com. After Jan. 1, title and registration services and decals will be available at MVD offices. The new laws also contain other provisions about titling, registration, equipment, and responsible operation.

Purchase of the decal is a “user-play, user-pay” fee that will allow the OHV to be legally operated in Arizona as well as in other states that have reciprocity agreements.

Revenue from purchases of the decal will be used in many ways to benefit Arizona OHV users. This will bolster the State Parks grant program that is used for damage mitigation, trail construction, habitat restoration and various other programs. Game and Fish will use funds to hire new law enforcement officers specifically for OHV enforcement. It is also creating new OHV education classes that can be taken by OHV users and may be court ordered for those found in violation of OHV laws. State Land will use a portion of the funds for law enforcement, habitat restoration and access across state trust lands.

Arizona Game and Fish Department, MVD, Arizona State Parks and Arizona State Land Department have worked cooperatively to determine a price that is reasonable for all users.

“It’s been a long time coming,” said Hank Rogers with the Apache County Rough Riders, an OHV group in eastern Arizona. “We’re very happy it’s been set at $25. We’re thrilled it’s here and look forward to putting the dollars to good use for the benefit of all Arizonans.

Enactment of the laws was the end product of a huge collaborative effort between OHV groups, conservation and sportsmen’s organizations, government agencies and elected officials, who all worked together to achieve this positive outcome for Arizona’s natural resources and outdoor recreation enthusiasts.

For more information about safe and responsible use, visit the Arizona Game and Fish Department at www.azgfd.gov/ohv.

For more information about where to ride in Arizona, visit Arizona State Parks at azstateparks.com/partnerships/ohv/OHVindex.html.

For more information about usage of state land, visit the Arizona State Land Department at www.land.state.az.us/programs/natural/recreation_permit.htm.

For more information about title and registration of OHVs, visit the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) at: www.azdot.gov. To purchase a decal for an OHV that has an Arizona title or registration, visit www.servicearizona.com.

Now before you go and cry out that Arizona has gone all wacky and is becoming the next peoples republic of California.  Take a good look at who sponsored Arizona State House Bill #2573.  The guy behind this bill is Rep. Jerry Weiers (R-Glendale) who is far from an Ultra Green nut job.  The reverse is the fact that the goal behind HB-2573 was to collect fees from the people who are using state lands.  Since OHV people are using the state lands, they should pay for what they use.

The free ride for the OHV group on state land is comming to a close.  I am sure my free ride on race tracks will soon come with a goverment fee as well.

6 Comments

You can dream the money collected will benefit OHV users, but what it really is, is another source of revenue for the state coffers to be used as they see fit. I guarantee there is no provision in the law that specifically states exactly what the collected monies will used for, giving the legislature free reign when it comes time to dole out the booty.

Rhino

Comment by Anonymous | December 23rd, 2008 5:23 pm | Permalink

Rhino,

Before you pass judgement, take a look at the arizona statue, 28-1177 (http://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/01177.htm).

You will find that 70% of all the funds go to an OHV fund, while 30% go to the highway fund.

D. The director shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, seventy per cent of the user fees collected pursuant to this section in the off-highway vehicle recreation fund established by section 28-1176 and thirty per cent of the user fees collected pursuant to this section in the Arizona highway user revenue fund.

Anyway, like I said, I expect my race bike to be next on the tax block.

Comment by Anonymous | December 23rd, 2008 5:39 pm | Permalink

My point exactly, 30% does NOT go to OHV user right off the top. Then, just what does the “OHV fund” spend it’s money on. I guarantee neither you nor I will ever know.

Rhino

Comment by Anonymous | December 23rd, 2008 6:36 pm | Permalink

The Bill:

http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/48leg/2r/bills/hb2573p.pdf

Its a tax. Period.

As to whether or not this will help the end-user, I doubt it. Environmental groups do not sponsor/co-develop Bills to help the end user…just ask the folks that *used* to use Glamis, but the Milk Vetch WEED was much more important…

From this:

http://www.yumasun.com/news/fee_40522___article.html/bill_hopes.html

We get this:

“A bipartisan group of co-sponsors, including Democratic Yuma Rep. Lynne Pancrazi, and a diverse coalition ranging from off-roading groups to environmental organizations supported the bill, saying it would help protect landscapes and preserve the pastime in Arizona.

The bill failed this week in the Senate Natural Resources and Rural Affairs Committee on a 3-3 vote.

Sen. Leah Landrum Taylor, D-Phoenix, was out sick. Weiers said he believes her vote would have made the difference.

He hopes to revive the bill through a strike-everything amendment to another piece of legislation.

Weiers said that without the bill, off-highway vehicles will continue to scar the landscape until the state and federal governments are forced to close areas to them, costing Arizona one of its biggest recreation and tourism draws.

“I think we’re going to kill a market that brings in millions of dollars in tax revenue to the state, and we’re killing our tourism industry,” Weiers said.”

I have personal experience with “off-roading groups” totaling screwing the riding population only to benefit the envirnmental groups - Cycle Conservation Club of Michigan helped put the nail in the coffin of open State land usage in the Michigan woods. Now, there is riding only on trails that are State sanctioned trails good enough for OHV and snowmobiles. Those trails suck…but it was agreed to by “off-road riding groups”. Yeah right.

Time will tell as to whether this tax helps or hurts riders.

The way I see it is simple: I have as much right to the land usage as some latte-sipping pasty whitey vegan faggot enviro-lobbyist sitting in an upper east side Manhattan high-rise who has never set foot in Arizona, let alone the great outdoors. But I’m sure, as with all taxes, is for my benefit.

Comment by angrybob | December 24th, 2008 7:41 am | Permalink

Bob,

I understand your frustration in getting to use public lands without an extra fee and then now you have to register your motorcycle and pay to go out and ride.

As far as killing the market due to an environmental law, that is many times not true. You ride a 4 stroke dirt bike now, because CARB basically forced the motorcycle manufacturers to stop making them. In general I don’t read you or others who complain that you can’t get one of those boss 2 stroke bikes now.

… Now the way I see it, I believe strongly in a pay for use concept. Since progressive taxation is wrong, then the choice is to charge people for using services and state/federal property.

Since that latte-sipping vegan is not riding on state land, that vegan should not have to PAY for your riding.

Comment by gothicbeaST | December 24th, 2008 10:00 am | Permalink

The problem with your premise is that, while that latte-sipping vegan isn’t paying for Bob’s riding, Bob might be paying for that vegan’s healthcare. Or for a smoker’s health care (if Bob doesn’t smoke). Or for the education of children when he doesn’t have any. Or for any number of other products, programs and perks in which Bob doesn’t participate.

So while I agree with you on a pay for use concept, the playing field isn’t level and won’t be until EVERYBODY is held to the same concept.

Jason

Comment by Jason | March 27th, 2009 9:54 am | Permalink

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Live Comment Preview

Comment by Somebody

Powered by WordPress 2.7.1    Rendered in 12 queries and 0.345 seconds.    CleanBreeze Theme   
   

Bad Behavior has blocked 936 access attempts in the last 7 days.